Conformity - Your data, your rules
LitSavant Ltd - Thinking outside the box ...

LitSavant Conformty Engine - Technical Specification

The LitSavant Conformity Engine is a standard Relativity application. As such, it is installed from an xml file.  The LitSavant Conformity Engine is supported on Relativity version 7.3 and higher.

When installing into Relativity version 7.3 you will only be able to load the application by using the Relativity Desktop Client.  You will also need system administration privileges.

When installing into Relativity version 7.4 you can load the application using the Relativity Desktop Client or via the web interface on the applications tab.  After the application has been installed for the first time in any given Relativity instance it will also be available for installation in a workspace via the application library.  As with version 7.3 you will need system administrator privileges to perform the initial installation.

Once the LitSavant Conformity Engine has been installed there is no additional technical specification for running it other than that it needs to operate under a user account with system administrator privileges.

The internal architecture of the LitSavant Conformity Engine includes familiar Relativity Objects (Views, Fields and Layouts) as well as some custom Objects and Rules.  Taken together these objects store the parameters for the logical operations that the user wants the system to do.  A series of Event Handlers then go ahead and actually execute those operations.

ECA
Early Case Assessment: a widely abused term in which corporate data is sifted and categorised with a view to determining an organisation's exposure in the context of a dispute.
more ...
ECA

Early Case Assessment: a widely abused term in which corporate data is sifted and categorised with a view to determining an organisation's exposure in the context of a dispute. The best ECA systems allow the sifting to take place within a corporation's own data store and can be used to drill down rapidly to identify the most pertinent evidentiary material and to facilitate decisions whether to litigate or settle.

Privilege claims
We note that the lawyers' notion that only document-by-document review will suffice is flatly wrong.
Hon. John M. Facciola and Jonathan M. Redgrave

more ...
Privilege claims

We note that the lawyers' notion that only document-by-document review will suffice is flatly wrong. Studies have established that manual document-by-document review alone may be one of the poorest ways to find what one is looking for in a large data set.

Hon. John M. Facciola and Jonathan M. Redgrave
Asserting and Challenging Privilege Claims in Modern Litigation: The Facciola-Redgrave Framework citing George L. Paul & Jason R. Baron, Information Inflation: Can the Legal System Adapt?, 13 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 1, 24-25 (2007), available at http://law.richmond.edu/jolt/v13i3/article10.pdf

© 2018 LitSavant Ltd. All rights reserved.